The Loose Association of Wargamers

But not as much of a Dissaster on morale as the Fields of Wank

I should imagine it would cause Disstinct Disscomfort

Hope EB doesn’t have Dissent in the ranks

levied troop wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:29 am Buff- that sounds like a problem with balance in the scenarios. What were the rules like? I was getting interested in them as I wanted a D&D-stylee set.

From memory they work on the 7TV which I quite enjoy

Is it not that the Gateway troops have rebelled at the calamitous losses at the River Wank and they've requested a choice of further commanders?

I heard the peasants were dining on horse flesh for months afterwards!

I know it was discussed on the previous forum, but shouldn't we just make it 12 units? I'd make each unit 1 point, regardless of what it is, and everyone fields 12 points. I think it's pointless discussing the merits of 2 medium guns equal one heavy gun, or two light regiments equal a normal regimen...

Thanks Gary. Going to try and paint some extra troops before the day so the above is worst case scenario in case I get side tracked with another period, which is likely!

I presume that this is still on in a couple of weeks? Gary, I'm bringing 4 regiments of foot plus a light foot regiment, a heavy gun, force commander and brigade commander. Can I please borrow: 3 regiments of cavalry, a medium gun, 2 regiments of foot and 2 brigade commanders? What time is kick off,...

I think the addition of a scenario with points attributed to successes other than just killing the opponent would change the game immeasurably, regardless of size. Number of units destroyed should not affect the victory points, rather number of objectives achieved should take the day. I'm a fan of m...

Essex Boy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2017 12:50 pm I wish I could find time to move my pike and shot stuff along. During the meanwhilst I'll just have to be satisfied with excellent photos such as this.

Great looking game. Many thanks.

Iain

Ditto. On all accounts!