Which one and why

[grizzlymc]

The poles actually had better tanks. But no tanks to their doctrine, they lost.

[BaronVonWreckedoften]

Actually, there were no tanks - they arrived after the cavalry had charged an infantry unit and been shot up at Krojanty on day one of the attack on Poland.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/ ... lry-charge

[Jeremy]

Why would we let history get in the way of a good game?

[tim.w]

Early Gerries, because I have a French army to paint and could give you something to chase.

[goat major]

FJ but early war. Lots of very cool operations you can play with them

[grizzlymc]

But, of course, this is purely hypothetical, because Jeremy is not painting u any new army for CoC.

[Jeremy]

FJ but early war. Lots of very cool operations you can play with them

Love the new para drop rules.

[Jeremy]

But, of course, this is purely hypothetical, because Jeremy is not painting u any new army for CoC.

Sadly, the mind is strong, but the flesh is weak. After a look at all the lists, bog standard line looks like the way to go. However..... I suspect a squad or two of paras will work their way in somewhere. I can legitimately expand them into a full sized force as they won’t be ‘a new army’

[grizzlymc]

Of course not Jeremy, now look at these gouda eating surrender monkeys.

[Jeremy]

Painting up WW2 French or Italians is much like Naps Spanish. A necessary, but ultimately pointless exercise