DbECW development thread.

For your Wargames Wittering
Post Reply
tim.w
Jezebel
Posts: 2806
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 2:21 am
Location: York

DbECW development thread.

Post by tim.w »

Moved over from the Vapnartak thread as this could get quite lengthy/interesting.

I think my wargames learning curve is about to steepen.

Base sizes currently under experimentation:
Foote - 60x30mm with 4 pike/8 shotte as standard.
Horse - 60x40mm with 5 heavies or 3-4 lights.

Guns - 60x50? Not sure what fits? Depends on gun?
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Jeremy »

Tim, you’re going to struggle to get more than 3 cavalry on a 60mmx40mm base. I’d suggest 3 on a 60mmx50mm base. Based on (excuse the pun) my experiences with my SYW cavalry, this is already fairly tight.
FreddBloggs
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3648
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
Location: left forum

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by FreddBloggs »

What size figures are these for?
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Paul »

FreddBloggs wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 4:47 pm What size figures are these for?
J is talking 28mm, not sure about Tim, given that DBN is primarily 15mm and so are Tims figures :)
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Jeremy »

Ah yes, I am. Sorry, just presumed we were all on the same page for the one true scale!
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Paul »

In any case the actual number of figures on a base for DBx is irrelevant other to serve as an identifier.
DBN already makes provision for double depth bases so deepening the bases probably won't matter much especially given that P&S units might deploy deeper than Napoleonic ones.
Jeremy wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 4:57 pm Ah yes, I am. Sorry, just presumed we were all on the same page for the one true scale!
6mm?
FreddBloggs
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3648
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
Location: left forum

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by FreddBloggs »

Was checking before wading in. For 15mm his numbers look fine.

On the cavalry note, my reading on the ecw leads me to believe all the cavalry was essentially impact in nature, rather than pistol or caracole style. I would also only do 3 types, Dragoon, Horse, hassleriggians.
FreddBloggs
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 3648
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:39 am
Location: left forum

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by FreddBloggs »

My 6mm ecw's as I slowly assemble them are going onto credit card sized bases. Gives a nice amount of figures in looks.
User avatar
Jeremy
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 9735
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 6:29 am
Location: Purgatory

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Jeremy »

I used to have ECW in 15mm. It is a great scale for battles. But 28mm just looks so awesome!
User avatar
Paul
Grizzly Madam
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2017 11:39 pm

Re: DbECW development thread.

Post by Paul »

FreddBloggs wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 5:04 pm Was checking before wading in. For 15mm his numbers look fine.

On the cavalry note, my reading on the ecw leads me to believe all the cavalry was essentially impact in nature, rather than pistol or caracole style. I would also only do 3 types, Dragoon, Horse, hassleriggians.
Unfortunately, and Alex will hate me for this, it would be better and more commercial to expand the rules for TYW as well as ECW, the more exotic cavalry tactics would be needed.
Post Reply